3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.


From: Sabrina Dubroca <s...@queasysnail.net>

[ Upstream commit 848235edb5c93ed086700584c8ff64f6d7fc778d ]

Currently, raw6_sk(sk)->ip6mr_table is set unconditionally during
ip6_mroute_setsockopt(MRT6_TABLE). A subsequent attempt at the same
setsockopt will fail with -ENOENT, since we haven't actually created
that table.

A similar fix for ipv4 was included in commit 5e1859fbcc3c ("ipv4: ipmr:
various fixes and cleanups").

Fixes: d1db275dd3f6 ("ipv6: ip6mr: support multiple tables")
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <s...@queasysnail.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
 net/ipv6/ip6mr.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
@@ -1788,7 +1788,8 @@ int ip6_mroute_setsockopt(struct sock *s
                ret = 0;
                if (!ip6mr_new_table(net, v))
                        ret = -ENOMEM;
-               raw6_sk(sk)->ip6mr_table = v;
+               else
+                       raw6_sk(sk)->ip6mr_table = v;
                return ret;

Reply via email to