On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 June 2018 at 14:44, Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]> wrote:
[cut] >> >> Is there any way to keep old behavior? > > I think the old behavior is sub-optimal. I am sure there are users > that really don't want the driver core to runtime resume the supplier > unconditionally. I agree. That said, the existing behavior has been there for quite a while and the callers of device_link_add() that have grown a dependency on it should be given a chance to change before it goes away. > I would rather go and fix the few users of device_link_add(), to use > DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE, in cases when they need it. Which BTW was the original idea. :-) > Of course I am fine if we do these changes in a step by step basis as well. OK, because that's what I'd prefer to do.
