4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Yury Norov <[email protected]> [ Upstream commit 4ba281d5bd9907355e6b79fb72049c9ed50cc670 ] test_find_first_bit() is intentionally sub-optimal, and may cause soft lockup due to long time of run on some systems. So decrease length of bitmap to traverse to avoid lockup. With the change below, time of test execution doesn't exceed 0.2 seconds on my testing system. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 4441fca0a27f5 ("lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions") Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- lib/find_bit_benchmark.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c +++ b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c @@ -132,7 +132,12 @@ static int __init find_bit_test(void) test_find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); test_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); test_find_last_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); - test_find_first_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + + /* + * test_find_first_bit() may take some time, so + * traverse only part of bitmap to avoid soft lockup. + */ + test_find_first_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN / 10); test_find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN); pr_err("\nStart testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap\n");
