On Mon, Jun 18 2018 at 13:54 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Lina Iyer <il...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18 2018 at 12:33 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:

Lina,

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Lina Iyer <il...@codeaurora.org> wrote:

+/**
 * struct rsc_drv: the Direct Resource Voter (DRV) of the
 * Resource State Coordinator controller (RSC)
 *
@@ -52,6 +78,7 @@ struct tcs_group {
 * @tcs:        TCS groups
 * @tcs_in_use: s/w state of the TCS
 * @lock:       synchronize state of the controller
+ * @ctrl:       controller to handle cases like batch requests


This is not only for batch requests.
This is handle to the DRV's client. @client might be a better name than
@ctrlr.


The name "ctrlr" also matches the name of the structure.  Are you
suggesting also renaming "struct rpmh_ctrlr" to "struct rpmh_client",
or you think they should be different names?

Just the name of the variable. I was just a nice to have. I wouldn't
block for this though.

I also got a couple Bot reported issues on this and the previous
revision that I have sent to Raju. He is planning to the post the v12
tomorrow his time after fixing them. If you can wait until then, I would
recommend picking up the v12 instead of this.

OK, if Raju can post the v12 tomorrow his time then that sounds like a
great plan to me.  While you're at it, I noticed that checkpatch
yelled about a few lines that were > 80 characters long for no good
reason.  Those would be nice to fix too.

Yup. He got that too.

-- Lina

Reply via email to