> > - s64 offset = (void *)v - (void *)location; > > + uintptr_t offset = (void *)v - (void *)location; > > s64 is signed, uintptr is not, so this might change behavior and needs > an explanation. >
Yes, it should be intptr_t. Thanks!
> > - s64 offset = (void *)v - (void *)location; > > + uintptr_t offset = (void *)v - (void *)location; > > s64 is signed, uintptr is not, so this might change behavior and needs > an explanation. >
Yes, it should be intptr_t. Thanks!