On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:31:46PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Then the existing comment is misleading and really needs change. > > Would it be sufficient to add something like "The memory barrier is > required to support the many-to-many ordering guaranteed by RCU grace > periods"?
What would lead me to wonder why after the load and not (also) before.
