Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns
where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is
still some room for improvement. E.g. if pfn and pfn+1 are in the same
memblock region, we can simply pfn++ instead of doing the binary search
in memblock_next_valid_pfn. Furthermore, if the pfn is in a *gap* of two
memory region, skip to next region directly if possible.

Signed-off-by: Jia He <jia...@hxt-semitech.com>
---
 include/linux/early_pfn.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/early_pfn.h b/include/linux/early_pfn.h
index 1b001c7..f9e40c3 100644
--- a/include/linux/early_pfn.h
+++ b/include/linux/early_pfn.h
@@ -3,31 +3,52 @@
 #ifndef __EARLY_PFN_H
 #define __EARLY_PFN_H
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID
+static int early_region_idx __init_memblock = -1;
 ulong __init_memblock memblock_next_valid_pfn(ulong pfn)
 {
        struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;
-       unsigned int right = type->cnt;
-       unsigned int mid, left = 0;
+       struct memblock_region *regions = type->regions;
+       uint right = type->cnt;
+       uint mid, left = 0;
+       ulong start_pfn, end_pfn, next_start_pfn;
        phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(++pfn);
 
+       /* fast path, return pfn+1 if next pfn is in the same region */
+       if (early_region_idx != -1) {
+               start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(regions[early_region_idx].base);
+               end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(regions[early_region_idx].base +
+                               regions[early_region_idx].size);
+
+               if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn < end_pfn)
+                       return pfn;
+
+               early_region_idx++;
+               next_start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(regions[early_region_idx].base);
+
+               if (pfn >= end_pfn && pfn <= next_start_pfn)
+                       return next_start_pfn;
+       }
+
+       /* slow path, do the binary searching */
        do {
                mid = (right + left) / 2;
 
-               if (addr < type->regions[mid].base)
+               if (addr < regions[mid].base)
                        right = mid;
-               else if (addr >= (type->regions[mid].base +
-                                 type->regions[mid].size))
+               else if (addr >= (regions[mid].base + regions[mid].size))
                        left = mid + 1;
                else {
-                       /* addr is within the region, so pfn is valid */
+                       early_region_idx = mid;
                        return pfn;
                }
        } while (left < right);
 
        if (right == type->cnt)
                return -1UL;
-       else
-               return PHYS_PFN(type->regions[right].base);
+
+       early_region_idx = right;
+
+       return PHYS_PFN(regions[early_region_idx].base);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(memblock_next_valid_pfn);
 #endif /*CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID*/
-- 
1.8.3.1

Reply via email to