On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Finally, note that documentation (including kerneldoc) remains to be > > > written, but hopefully this will not hinder review given that the > > > current interfaces are fairly self-describing. > > > > This all looks great. Thanks for doing this work and adding a new > > subsystem for something that has been asked for for many years. > > > > All now merged in my tree, nice job! > > I don't think discussion was finished on this one. > > In particular, we agreed that /dev/gnssrawX would be better device > name, so that we still have place where to put proper abstraction > layer in future.
I did not agree with you on that. I said we could consider that name if this was to be changed at all, which I do not think is necessary for the reasons spelled out in this thread. Johan
