On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 11:37:11 -0400 Tony Krowiak <akrow...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 07/02/2018 10:38 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > On 06/29/2018 11:11 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote: > >> Introduces a new CPU model feature and two CPU model > >> facilities to support AP virtualization for KVM guests. > >> > >> CPU model feature: > >> > >> The KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP feature indicates that > >> AP instructions are available on the guest. This > >> feature will be enabled by the kernel only if the AP > >> instructions are installed on the linux host. This feature > >> must be specifically turned on for the KVM guest from > >> userspace to use the VFIO AP device driver for guest > >> access to AP devices. > >> > >> CPU model facilities: > >> > >> 1. AP Query Configuration Information (QCI) facility is installed. > >> > >> This is indicated by setting facilities bit 12 for > >> the guest. The kernel will not enable this facility > >> for the guest if it is not set on the host. This facility > >> must not be set by userspace if the KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP > >> feature is not installed. > >> > >> If this facility is not set for the KVM guest, then only > >> APQNs with an APQI less than 16 will be available to the > >> guest regardless of the guest's matrix configuration. This > >> is a limitation of the AP bus running on the guest. > >> > >> 2. AP Facilities Test facility (APFT) is installed. > >> > >> This is indicated by setting facilities bit 15 for > >> the guest. The kernel will not enable this facility for > >> the guest if it is not set on the host. This facility > >> must not be set by userspace if the KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP > >> feature is not installed. > >> > >> If this facility is not set for the KVM guest, then no > >> AP devices will be available to the guest regardless of > >> the guest's matrix configuration. This is a limitation > >> of the AP bus running under the guest. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> > >> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrow...@linux.ibm.com> > > I think it probably should be at the end of the series, other than that its > > good. > > If I move this to the end of the series, the very next patch checks the > > KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP feature? Introduce it here, offer it only with the last patch?
