On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 01:12:01PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke <m...@chromium.org> wrote:
> > This adds the spmi-temp-alarm node to pm8998 based on the examples in the
> > bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <m...@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - none
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> > index 92bed1e7d4bb..2f4989e7ef68 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> > @@ -11,6 +11,13 @@
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> > + pm8998_temp: qcom,temp-alarm@2400 {
>
> Remove "qcom," from the node name (AKA please change to
> "temp-alarm@2400"). Someone internal in Qualcomm seems to have
> started this trend so you see it on all downstream kernels, but
> upstream device tree isn't supposed to have it.
Ok, thanks
> > + compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm";
> > + reg = <0x2400 0x100>;
>
> Why are there two numbers for the "reg"? Should just be 0x2400.
>From /Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-spmi-temp-alarm.txt:
Required properties:
...
- reg: Specifies the SPMI address and length of the controller's
registers.
