On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:47:35 +0200 Rodolfo Giometti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:20:06PM +0200, Alessandro Zummo wrote: > > > > 'cos they are two different things :) I don't know how > > the "Lightweight At Daemon" works and if it requires AIE support. > > Yes, it requires such support. > > > It would be better to use system timers to do scheduled > > things rather than using AIE, which is usually meant > > to wake up the hardware. > > I see. But if I wish adding such support anyway into kernel which > could be the "best way" to do it? :) I'd rather fix the daemon, but if you truly want, you may write some code, maybe using UIE emulation as a starter, and show the community why it is needed and appropriate. I, personally, am against such emulation but will not oppose it if there is general consensus from the community. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
