Oleg Verych wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:48:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> The -mm kernel already implements what your proposed PTS would do. ... >> Plus it gives testers more or less all patches currently pending >> inclusion into Linus' tree in one kernel they can test. > > Crazy development{0}. Somebody knows, that comprehensively testing > hibernation is their thing. I don't care about it, i care about foo, bar. > Thus i can apply for example lguest patches and implement and test new > asm-offset replacement, *easily*.
That's right. But the production of subsystem test patchkits is volunteer work which will be hard to unify. I'm not saying it's impossible to reach some degree of organized production of test patchkits; after all we already have some standardization regarding patch submission which is volunteer work too. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -==- =--== http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/