On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Robert Richter wrote:

> Index: linux-2.6.22-rc3/arch/x86_64/perfmon/perfmon_k8.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc3.orig/arch/x86_64/perfmon/perfmon_k8.c
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc3/arch/x86_64/perfmon/perfmon_k8.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,12 @@ static int pfm_k8_probe_pmu(void)
>               return -1;
>       }
>  
> -     if (current_cpu_data.x86 != 15) {
> +     switch (current_cpu_data.x86) {
> +     case 15:
> +     case 16:
> +             PFM_INFO("found family=%d", current_cpu_data.x86);
> +             break;
> +     default:
>               PFM_INFO("unsupported family=%d", current_cpu_data.x86);
>               return -1;
>       }

This still shouldn't be a switch clause because you're hiding the return 
-1; in the default label.  I think it would be better to write:

        if (current_cpu_data.x86 == 15 || current_cpu_data.x86 == 16)
                PFM_INFO("found family=%d", current_cpu_data.x86);
        else {
                PFM_INFO("unsupported family=%d", current_cpu_data.x86);
                return -1;
        }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to