On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:24:44 -0400 Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatas...@oracle.com> 
wrote:

> On 07/13/2018 09:17 AM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 04:37:26PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> >> +static void *sparsemap_buf __meminitdata;
> >> +static void *sparsemap_buf_end __meminitdata;
> >> +
> >> +void __init sparse_buffer_init(unsigned long size, int nid)
> >> +{
> >> +  BUG_ON(sparsemap_buf);
> > 
> > Why do we need a BUG_ON() here?
> > Looking at the code I cannot really see how we can end up with 
> > sparsemap_buf being NULL.
> > Is it just for over-protection?
> 
> This checks that we do not accidentally leak memory by calling 
> sparse_buffer_init() consequently without sparse_buffer_fini() in-between.

A memory leak isn't serious enough to justify crashing the kernel. 
Therefore

--- a/mm/sparse.c~mm-sparse-abstract-sparse-buffer-allocations-fix-fix
+++ a/mm/sparse.c
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static void *sparsemap_buf_end __meminit
 
 void __init sparse_buffer_init(unsigned long size, int nid)
 {
-       BUG_ON(sparsemap_buf);
+       WARN_ON(sparsemap_buf); /* forgot to call sparse_buffer_fini()? */
        sparsemap_buf =
                memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, PAGE_SIZE,
                                                __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS),
_

Reply via email to