On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > After commenting on your first set of patches, I've been using it a little > > more. In my use, these debugging messages weren't very helpful because > > "pfm_file_ops" can indicate pfm_mmap, pfm_read, pfm_poll, etc. Could > > these be changed to be more specific based on the function they're in? > > > the PFM_DBG() macro adds the CPU, function name and line number to the > printed string. >
That's not the case in what I currently have in my tree, I'll go back and see what I'm missing. What's the current status of the perfmon2 patchset that Robert's work is based on? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
