On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 6:44:22 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17-07-18, 22:48, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > If of_nvmem_cell_get() fails due to probe deferal, we shouldn't print an
> > error message. Just be silent in this case.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-kryo.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-kryo.c 
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-kryo.c
> > index 29389accf3e9..b8d1e6875f16 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-kryo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-kryo.c
> > @@ -109,8 +109,9 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_kryo_probe(struct 
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >     speedbin_nvmem = of_nvmem_cell_get(np, NULL);
> >     of_node_put(np);
> >     if (IS_ERR(speedbin_nvmem)) {
> > -           dev_err(cpu_dev, "Could not get nvmem cell: %ld\n",
> > -                   PTR_ERR(speedbin_nvmem));
> > +           if (PTR_ERR(speedbin_nvmem) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +                   dev_err(cpu_dev, "Could not get nvmem cell: %ld\n",
> > +                           PTR_ERR(speedbin_nvmem));
> >             return PTR_ERR(speedbin_nvmem);
> >     }
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

Reply via email to