On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:16:30AM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index fbfc3f1d368a..8b50eea4b607 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -2090,8 +2090,14 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
>       sub_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &rq->dl);
>       set_task_cpu(next_task, later_rq->cpu);
>       add_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Update the later_rq clock here, because the clock is used
> +      * by the cpufreq_update_util() inside __add_running_bw().
> +      */
> +     update_rq_clock(later_rq);
>       add_running_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl);
> -     activate_task(later_rq, next_task, 0);
> +     activate_task(later_rq, next_task, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
>       ret = 1;
>  
>       resched_curr(later_rq);

Why isn't push_rt_task() affected by the very same issue?

Reply via email to