4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>

commit e96f46ee8587607a828f783daa6eb5b44d25004d upstream

The style for the 'status' file is CamelCase or this. _.

Fixes: fae1fa0fc ("proc: Provide details on speculation flaw mitigations")
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <d...@amazon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <sriva...@csail.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley (VMware) <matt.hels...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Makhalov <amakha...@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Bo Gan <g...@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---

 fs/proc/array.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static inline void task_seccomp(struct s
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
        seq_printf(m, "Seccomp:\t%d\n", p->seccomp.mode);
 #endif
-       seq_printf(m, "\nSpeculation Store Bypass:\t");
+       seq_printf(m, "\nSpeculation_Store_Bypass:\t");
        switch (arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(p, PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS)) {
        case -EINVAL:
                seq_printf(m, "unknown");


Reply via email to