Hi, On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> 1. Kconfig symbols will always have code associated with them. > That's the entire purpose of Kconfig, is it not? A possible counter example: CONFIG_SCSI. (RAID_ATTRS is currently a little misplaced). It's optional for any config symbol to have any code attached to it, menuconfig doesn't change anything. > 2. "menuconfig" symbols, otoh, were _invented_ for another reason > entirely: presentation and user interface i.e. so that users are able > to disable entire menus (and all the options contained therein) > without having to enter into the menu first, and without having to > disable all options individually (which was the situation that existed > before the introduction of these menuconfig objects). Since I'm the one who _invented_ it, I can tell you you're wrong. :) This functionality isn't limited to menuconfig symbols. The menu option simply changes how the child symbols can be displayed. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
