On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:25:16PM +0100, Quentin Perret wrote:
> @@ -5100,8 +5118,17 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct
> *p, int flags)
> update_cfs_group(se);
> }
>
> - if (!se)
> + if (!se) {
> add_nr_running(rq, 1);
> + /*
> + * The utilization of a new task is 'wrong' so wait for it
> + * to build some utilization history before trying to detect
> + * the overutilized flag.
> + */
> + if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
> + update_overutilized_status(rq);
> +
> + }
>
> hrtick_update(rq);
> }
That is a somewhat dodgy hack. There is no guarantee what so ever that
when the task wakes next its history is any better. The comment doesn't
reflect this I feel.
