On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > bit of arch/riscv diff here so I don't mind taking it through the RISC-V tree, > but there's also some irqchip and clocksource stuff as well so I'm not sure if > that's OK to do.
I have no objections if that goes through the risc-v tree once the DT stuff is sorted out. For the clocksource and irqchip bits: Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> Thanks, tglx