On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> bit of arch/riscv diff here so I don't mind taking it through the RISC-V tree,
> but there's also some irqchip and clocksource stuff as well so I'm not sure if
> that's OK to do.

I have no objections if that goes through the risc-v tree once the DT stuff
is sorted out.

For the clocksource and irqchip bits:

    Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

Thanks,

        tglx

Reply via email to