On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 07:23:27AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 08/03/2018 04:45 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> Within the kernel two locations with direct invocations of the WBINVD > >> instruction are coverted to native_wbinvd() and compile tested. Neither > >> location is likely to be used on the platforms supporting Cache > >> Pseudo-Locking. > > Can we just get rid of WBINVD? > > In general, or just this specific case?
In general I think. There aren't that many users IIRC.
