On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Mao Wenan wrote:

> There is no need to have the 'T *v' variable static
> since new value always be assigned before use it.

The code is:

                static int prev_max;

                /*
                 * Print this only once. If the admin changes the limit,
                 * print a new message when reaching the limit again.
                 */
                if (prev_max != max_lock_depth) {

So it is referenced before it is initialized.

julia


>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowe...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> index 2823d41..ba70db8 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct 
> *task,
>        * We limit the lock chain length for each invocation.
>        */
>       if (++depth > max_lock_depth) {
> -             static int prev_max;
> +             int prev_max;
>
>               /*
>                * Print this only once. If the admin changes the limit,
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

Reply via email to