On 08.08.2018 19:13, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:17:44PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote: >> On 08.08.2018 10:20, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Tue 07-08-18 18:37:36, Kirill Tkhai wrote: >>>> This patch kills all CONFIG_SRCU defines and >>>> the code under !CONFIG_SRCU. >>> >>> The last time somebody tried to do this there was a pushback due to >>> kernel tinyfication. So this should really give some numbers about the >>> code size increase. Also why can't we make this depend on MMU. Is >>> anybody else than the reclaim asking for unconditional SRCU usage? >> >> I don't know one. The size numbers (sparc64) are: >> >> $ size image.srcu.disabled >> text data bss dec hex filename >> 5117546 8030506 1968104 15116156 e6a77c image.srcu.disabled >> $ size image.srcu.enabled >> text data bss dec hex filename >> 5126175 8064346 1968104 15158625 e74d61 image.srcu.enabled >> The difference is: 15158625-15116156 = 42469 ~41Kb > > 41k is a *substantial* size increase. However, can you compare > tinyconfig with and without this patch? That may have a smaller change.
$ size image.srcu.disabled text data bss dec hex filename 1105900 195456 63232 1364588 14d26c image.srcu.disabled $ size image.srcu.enabled text data bss dec hex filename 1106960 195528 63232 1365720 14d6d8 image.srcu.enabled 1365720-1364588 = 1132 ~ 1Kb
