On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 12:02:58AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 02:43:36PM +0800, Alan Kao wrote: > > It does look a little bit weird. Should I send a v6 for this? > > Yes, please resend the series or just this patch. > > I think the hswap.h definition should go away and we should just > keep the switch_to.h one, even if that means including the header > in another C file. >
It turns out that only cpufeature.c and switch_to.h are affected by hwcap.h. As switch_to.h already had extern has_fpu declaration, the one in hwcap.h is redundant and can be removed safely. I will resend just this patch, and mark it as v6.
