[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > Is there some hope that at least the Linux kernel interface definition > > files and > > everything recursively included from these files will be rewritten in > > vanilla > > ANSI C? > > this has been discussed many times and the answer is that the kernel is > not gong to change it's side of things to ANSI C.
Well, there is no need to go to ANSI C as pre-ANSI would to it also. The problem is non ANSI gcc extensions. > that doesn't mean that one of the many projects out there to create > seperate interface headers won't do this. > > however, there is another interesting thing going on at the moment. The > standards commity is currently deciding what will be in the next rev of > the C specs (tentitivly labels C1x for discussions, they are hopeing to > release them in '09 or '10) > > some of the things that are GCC extentions are going to be added to the > spec (ahtough possibly with a change to the syntax) This may make sense after it did happen, but it does not help today. > so now is the time to talk to your local reps who go to these meetings and > make your suggestions for what should be added to the standard and what > should not be. > > remember that anything to be added must be implemented somehwere, > preferrably by multiple seperate compilers. Using plain C in the Linux kernel include files would be sufficient for all compilers that make sense to be supported. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/