Hi Heiko:

On 2018年08月10日 04:09, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2016, 10:20:54 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang:
>
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> index a6dd623..12ce265 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> @@ -101,6 +101,18 @@
>>                      };
>>              };
>>  
>> +            idle-states {
>> +                    entry-method = "psci";
>> +                    cpu_sleep: cpu-sleep-0 {
>> +                            compatible = "arm,idle-state";
>> +                            local-timer-stop;
>> +                            arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x0010000>;
>> +                            entry-latency-us = <350>;
>> +                            exit-latency-us = <600>;
>> +                            min-residency-us = <1150>;
> Looking at the chromeos kernel, there are some more patches adapting
> this idle-state to use different timings.
Yes, we have another values. So the values of this patch are wrong.
>
> There also was a cluster-idle state added for a while but that seems to
> cause audio issues according to the CrOS history.

DMA or Audio driver should add PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY or other methods to avoid 
the effects of idle.
Idle itself is good.

Thanks!

Reply via email to