On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:15:36 +0900 (JST) Atsushi Nemoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:46:20 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > + const static struct m41t80_chip_info *chip; > > > > It's a bit weird that `chip' has static storage class here. Was that > > deliberate? > > Oh the variable should not be static! > I will send updated patch. I'll fix it up. > BTW, I reveived following mails: > > Subject: - rtc-watchdog-support-for-rtc-m41t80-driver-take-2.patch removed > from -mm tree > Subject: - rtc-add-rtc-m41t80-driver-take-2.patch removed from -mm tree > Subject: + rtc-add-rtc-m41t80-driver.patch added to -mm tree > Subject: + rtc-watchdog-support-for-rtc-m41t80-driver.patch added to -mm tree > > Are you going back to "take 1" patches? Why? Stupidity, apparently. Will restore the take2 patches. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
