On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 06:03:43AM -0700, Barry Song wrote:
> as you are already in a tasklet, it is unnecessary to call spin_lock_bh.
>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <[email protected]>
Thanks
> ---
> drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> index 4bf7256..4e55768 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> @@ -1600,7 +1600,7 @@ static void at_xdmac_tasklet(unsigned long data)
> if (atchan->status & AT_XDMAC_CIS_ROIS)
> dev_err(chan2dev(&atchan->chan), "request overflow
> error!!!");
>
> - spin_lock_bh(&atchan->lock);
> + spin_lock(&atchan->lock);
> desc = list_first_entry(&atchan->xfers_list,
> struct at_xdmac_desc,
> xfer_node);
> @@ -1610,7 +1610,7 @@ static void at_xdmac_tasklet(unsigned long data)
> txd = &desc->tx_dma_desc;
>
> at_xdmac_remove_xfer(atchan, desc);
> - spin_unlock_bh(&atchan->lock);
> + spin_unlock(&atchan->lock);
>
> if (!at_xdmac_chan_is_cyclic(atchan)) {
> dma_cookie_complete(txd);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
