The NEMC module in the JZ4725B is very similar to the one in the JZ4780.
The only difference I could spot was that the TAS/TAH timings are
limited to 7 clock ticks on the JZ4725B instead of 15 on the JZ4780.

Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
index ef3f20e46590..c52d254988dc 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
@@ -44,9 +44,14 @@
 #define NEMC_NFCSR_NFCEn(n)    BIT((((n) - 1) << 1) + 1)
 #define NEMC_NFCSR_TNFEn(n)    BIT(16 + (n) - 1)
 
+struct jz4780_nemc_soc_info {
+       uint8_t tas_tah_cycles_max;
+};
+
 struct jz4780_nemc {
        spinlock_t lock;
        struct device *dev;
+       const struct jz4780_nemc_soc_info *soc_info;
        void __iomem *base;
        struct clk *clk;
        uint32_t clk_period;
@@ -202,7 +207,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc 
*nemc,
        if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tAS", &val) == 0) {
                smcr &= ~NEMC_SMCR_TAS_MASK;
                cycles = jz4780_nemc_ns_to_cycles(nemc, val);
-               if (cycles > 15) {
+               if (cycles > nemc->soc_info->tas_tah_cycles_max) {
                        dev_err(nemc->dev, "tAS %u is too high (%u cycles)\n",
                                val, cycles);
                        return false;
@@ -214,7 +219,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc 
*nemc,
        if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tAH", &val) == 0) {
                smcr &= ~NEMC_SMCR_TAH_MASK;
                cycles = jz4780_nemc_ns_to_cycles(nemc, val);
-               if (cycles > 15) {
+               if (cycles > nemc->soc_info->tas_tah_cycles_max) {
                        dev_err(nemc->dev, "tAH %u is too high (%u cycles)\n",
                                val, cycles);
                        return false;
@@ -278,6 +283,10 @@ static int jz4780_nemc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        if (!nemc)
                return -ENOMEM;
 
+       nemc->soc_info = device_get_match_data(dev);
+       if (!nemc->soc_info)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
        spin_lock_init(&nemc->lock);
        nemc->dev = dev;
 
@@ -370,8 +379,17 @@ static int jz4780_nemc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
        return 0;
 }
 
+static const struct jz4780_nemc_soc_info jz4725b_soc_info = {
+       .tas_tah_cycles_max = 7,
+};
+
+static const struct jz4780_nemc_soc_info jz4780_soc_info = {
+       .tas_tah_cycles_max = 15,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id jz4780_nemc_dt_match[] = {
-       { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nemc" },
+       { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4725b-nemc", .data = &jz4725b_soc_info, },
+       { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nemc", .data = &jz4780_soc_info, },
        {},
 };
 
-- 
2.18.0

Reply via email to