Joe Perches wrote: > > If execution speed is really an issue, as > > almost all of the uses are for const strings, > > why not use a #define and avoid the runtime > > cost of strlen where possible. > > fyi: an x86-64 defconfig increases < .5 kb and > presumably is faster for most all seq_puts uses
> -void seq_puts(struct seq_file *m, const char *s); > +#define seq_puts(m, s) seq_write(m, s, strlen(s)) I don't know, seq_puts() patch was last minute observation. It is independent of _print_integer() stuff. Your version should be "static inline" of course.
