From: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>

Once the breakpoint was succesfully modified, the attr->disabled value
is in bp->attr.disabled. So there's no reason to set it again, removing
that.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Cc: Milind Chabbi <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
index fb229d9c7f3c..3e560d7609fd 100644
--- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -526,10 +526,9 @@ int modify_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp, 
struct perf_event_attr *att
        if (err)
                return err;
 
-       if (!attr->disabled) {
+       if (!attr->disabled)
                perf_event_enable(bp);
-               bp->attr.disabled = 0;
-       }
+
        return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(modify_user_hw_breakpoint);
-- 
2.14.4

Reply via email to