4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: John Hurley <john.hur...@netronome.com>
[ Upstream commit ee614c871014045b45fae149b7245fc22a0bbdd8 ]
Function nfp_flower_repr_get_type_and_port expects an enum nfp_repr_type
return value but, if the repr type is unknown, returns a value of type
enum nfp_flower_cmsg_port_type. This means that if FW encodes the port
ID in a way the driver does not understand instead of dropping the frame
driver may attribute it to a physical port (uplink) provided the port
number is less than physical port count.
Fix this and ensure a net_device of NULL is returned if the repr can not
be determined.
Fixes: 1025351a88a4 ("nfp: add flower app")
Signed-off-by: John Hurley <john.hur...@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/main.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/main.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ nfp_flower_repr_get_type_and_port(struct
return NFP_REPR_TYPE_VF;
}
- return NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_PORT_TYPE_UNSPEC;
+ return __NFP_REPR_TYPE_MAX;
}
static struct net_device *
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ nfp_flower_repr_get(struct nfp_app *app,
u8 port = 0;
repr_type = nfp_flower_repr_get_type_and_port(app, port_id, &port);
+ if (repr_type > NFP_REPR_TYPE_MAX)
+ return NULL;
reprs = rcu_dereference(app->reprs[repr_type]);
if (!reprs)
