Quoting James Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Patch tests fine for me for expected capability behavior with lsm=n, > > lsm=y, lsm=y+capability=y, lsm=y+selinux=y, and lsm=y+caps=y+selinux=y. > > > > So while I'm opposed to the patch, it appears to be safe. > > I've also tested a bunch of scenarios: allmodconfig, lsm=y,cap=n, > selinux=y,cap=n etc.
I was wondering about the uninlining of all those functions, so did a set of performance runs. Found no statistically relevant change in dbench, tbench, or reaim. (tried to run kernbench too but the benchmark failed somewhere and i didn't care enough to look into it) -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
