On 09/03/2018 06:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> + EBLOCK = 0x9, >> + EPA = 0xA, >> + EWB = 0xB, >> + ETRACK = 0xC, >> + EAUG = 0xD, >> + EMODPR = 0xE, >> + EMODT = 0xF, >> +}; > Hmm... This E prefix confuses me with (system wide) error codes. Has > it been discussed before? If so, can you point on the conclusion why > the current format is good?
Making them SGX_EWHATEVER isn't a horrible idea.
