Hi Jay,
Thanks for the patch. Couple of comments below.
On 09/04/2018 07:08 PM, jgka...@fb.com wrote:
> From: Jay Kamat <jgka...@fb.com>
>
> Fix a couple issues with cg_read_strcmp(), to improve correctness of
> cgroup tests
> - Fix cg_read_strcmp() always returning 0 for empty "needle" strings
> - Fix a memory leak in cg_read_strcmp()
>
> Fixes: 84092dbcf901 ("selftests: cgroup: add memory controller self-tests")
>
> Signed-off-by: Jay Kamat <jgka...@fb.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> index 1e9e3c470561..4aadf38bcd5d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> @@ -91,15 +91,24 @@ int cg_read_strcmp(const char *cgroup, const char
> *control,
> {
> size_t size = strlen(expected) + 1;
> char *buf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Handle the case of comparing against empty string */
> + if (size == 1)
> + size = 32;
Why not test for !expected and avoid strlen(expected) all together?
>
> buf = malloc(size);
> if (!buf)
> return -1;
>
> - if (cg_read(cgroup, control, buf, size))
> + if (cg_read(cgroup, control, buf, size)) {
> + free(buf);
> return -1;
> + }
>
> - return strcmp(expected, buf);
> + ret = strcmp(expected, buf);
> + free(buf);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> int cg_read_strstr(const char *cgroup, const char *control, const char
> *needle)
>
thanks,
-- Shuah
