3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: jiangyiwen <jiangyi...@huawei.com>

commit 23cba9cbde0bba05d772b335fe5f66aa82b9ad19 upstream.

Because the value of limit is VIRTQUEUE_NUM, if index is equal to
limit, it will cause sg array out of bounds, so correct the judgement
of BUG_ON.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5b63d5f6.6080...@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyi...@huawei.com>
Reported-By: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Jun Piao <piao...@huawei.com>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.marti...@cea.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 net/9p/trans_virtio.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int pack_sg_list(struct scatterli
                s = rest_of_page(data);
                if (s > count)
                        s = count;
-               BUG_ON(index > limit);
+               BUG_ON(index >= limit);
                /* Make sure we don't terminate early. */
                sg_unmark_end(&sg[index]);
                sg_set_buf(&sg[index++], data, s);
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ pack_sg_list_p(struct scatterlist *sg, i
                s = rest_of_page(data);
                if (s > count)
                        s = count;
+               BUG_ON(index >= limit);
                /* Make sure we don't terminate early. */
                sg_unmark_end(&sg[index]);
                sg_set_page(&sg[index++], pdata[i++], s, data_off);


Reply via email to