Hi Jerome,

Thank you for the patch.

On 09/06/2018 03:59 PM, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> When probing, if we fail to get the pwm due to probe deferal, we shouldn't
> print an error message. Just be silent in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbru...@baylibre.com>
> ---
>  drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> index df80c89ebe7f..5d3faae51d59 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> @@ -100,8 +100,9 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct 
> led_pwm_priv *priv,
>               led_data->pwm = devm_pwm_get(dev, led->name);
>       if (IS_ERR(led_data->pwm)) {
>               ret = PTR_ERR(led_data->pwm);
> -             dev_err(dev, "unable to request PWM for %s: %d\n",
> -                     led->name, ret);
> +             if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +                     dev_err(dev, "unable to request PWM for %s: %d\n",
> +                             led->name, ret);
>               return ret;
>       }
>  
>

Applied.

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

Reply via email to