On 9/10/18 4:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:05:29AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
From: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com>
It's a bit confusing exactly what this function does: it actually
returns the hartid of an OF processor node, failing with -1 on invalid
nodes. I've changed the name to _hartid() in order to make that a bit
more clear, as well as adding a comment.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com>
Looks generally good, but it is going to conflict with the dt iterators
series from Rob. Given that this is just a little cleanup it might be
worth deferring until the next merge window.
Sure. np. I guess the entire series can be parked in for-next until the
next merge window opens.
Regards,
Atish
Otherwise looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
