Hi Shawn, On 11.09.2018 03:53, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 04:19:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:00:23AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> >>>> I was expecting to get a pull request with the precursor patches in it - >>>> the regulator driver seems to get a moderate amount of development so >>>> there's a reasonable risk of conflicts. >> >>> What about you create a stable topic branch for regulator patches and I >>> pull it into IMX tree? >> >> Sure, I can send a pull request back but the first two patches in the >> series are ARM ones - are you OK with me just applying them and sending >> them in the pull request or do you want to apply them first? > > I just took another look at the series. It seems that there is no > build-time dependency between regulator and platform patches. So I > think we can handle the series like: > > - You apply patch #3, #4 and #5 on regulator tree; > - I apply the reset on IMX tree. > > There shouldn't be any build or run time regression on either tree, and > the feature that the series adds will be available when both trees get > merged together on -next or Linus tree. > > @Oleksij Is my understanding above correct?
Description: OpenPGP digital signature