4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tomas Bortoli <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 9f476d7c540cb57556d3cc7e78704e6cd5100f5f ]

It may be possible to run p9_fd_cancel() with a deleted req->req_list
and incur in a double del. To fix hold the client->lock while changing
the status, so the other threads will be synchronized.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Tomas Bortoli <[email protected]>
Reported-by: [email protected]
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected]>
To: Ron Minnich <[email protected]>
To: Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Yiwen Jiang <[email protected]>
Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 net/9p/trans_fd.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
@@ -195,15 +195,14 @@ static void p9_mux_poll_stop(struct p9_c
 static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_conn *m, int err)
 {
        struct p9_req_t *req, *rtmp;
-       unsigned long flags;
        LIST_HEAD(cancel_list);
 
        p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "mux %p err %d\n", m, err);
 
-       spin_lock_irqsave(&m->client->lock, flags);
+       spin_lock(&m->client->lock);
 
        if (m->err) {
-               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->client->lock, flags);
+               spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
                return;
        }
 
@@ -215,7 +214,6 @@ static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_con
        list_for_each_entry_safe(req, rtmp, &m->unsent_req_list, req_list) {
                list_move(&req->req_list, &cancel_list);
        }
-       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->client->lock, flags);
 
        list_for_each_entry_safe(req, rtmp, &cancel_list, req_list) {
                p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "call back req %p\n", req);
@@ -224,6 +222,7 @@ static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_con
                        req->t_err = err;
                p9_client_cb(m->client, req, REQ_STATUS_ERROR);
        }
+       spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
 }
 
 static int
@@ -379,8 +378,9 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_str
                if (m->req->status != REQ_STATUS_ERROR)
                        status = REQ_STATUS_RCVD;
                list_del(&m->req->req_list);
-               spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
+               /* update req->status while holding client->lock  */
                p9_client_cb(m->client, m->req, status);
+               spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
                m->rc.sdata = NULL;
                m->rc.offset = 0;
                m->rc.capacity = 0;


Reply via email to