Hi Akash,

Am Freitag, 14. September 2018, 14:09:09 CEST schrieb Akash Gajjar:
> Rockpro64 board is a rockchip RK3399 based board from pine64.org.
> This commit adds initial device tree support for Rockpro64 board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akash Gajjar <akash_gaj...@mentor.com>

generally the patch looks great already. Hopefully we will get an Ack
from the dt-maintaintainers for the binding and I noticed two small
issues I'll describe below.


> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt |   4 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile              |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts  | 770 
> +++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 775 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
> index acfd3c7..ac95183 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
> @@ -160,6 +160,10 @@ Rockchip platforms device tree bindings
>      Required root node properties:
>      - compatible = "pine64,rock64", "rockchip,rk3328";
>  
> +- Pine64 RockPro64 board:
> +    Required root node properties:
> +    - compatible = "pine64,rockpro64", "rockchip,rk3399";
> +
>  - Rockchip PX3 Evaluation board:
>      Required root node properties:
>        - compatible = "rockchip,px3-evb", "rockchip,px3", "rockchip,rk3188";
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> index b0092d9..03d523a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> @@ -14,5 +14,6 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-firefly.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-gru-bob.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-gru-kevin.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-puma-haikou.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rockpro64.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-sapphire.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9e2d4d9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,770 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2017 Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd.

Rockchip copyright from 2017? Where is the original
dts coming from?


> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +#include <dt-bindings/input/linux-event-codes.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h>
> +#include "rk3399.dtsi"
> +#include "rk3399-opp.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> +     model = "Pine64 RockPro64";
> +     compatible = "pine64,rockpro64", "rockchip,rk3399";
> +
> +     chosen {
> +             stdout-path = "serial2:1500000n8";
> +     };
> +
> +     backlight: backlight {
> +             compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> +             enable-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +             pwms = <&pwm0 0 25000 0>;
> +             brightness-levels = <
> +                       0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
> +                       8   9  10  11  12  13  14  15
> +                      16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23
> +                      24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31
> +                      32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39
> +                      40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47
> +                      48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55
> +                      56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63
> +                      64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71
> +                      72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79
> +                      80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87
> +                      88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95
> +                      96  97  98  99 100 101 102 103
> +                     104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111
> +                     112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
> +                     120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127
> +                     128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
> +                     136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
> +                     144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151
> +                     152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159
> +                     160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167
> +                     168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175
> +                     176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183
> +                     184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191
> +                     192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199
> +                     200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207
> +                     208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215
> +                     216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223
> +                     224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231
> +                     232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239
> +                     240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247
> +                     248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255>;
> +             default-brightness-level = <200>;

with recent additions to the pwm-backlight we shouldn't need the
long brightness-levels table and default-brightness-level anymore.


Heiko


Reply via email to