On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 02:54:40PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Switch the maps source from evlist into thread data.
> 
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-2r6hn6shl185j66b4vl1k...@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 5c6b56f164a9..d6fef646b67f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ struct record {
>       int                     threads_cnt;
>  };
>  
> +static __thread struct record_thread *thread;
> +
>  static volatile int auxtrace_record__snapshot_started;
>  static DEFINE_TRIGGER(auxtrace_snapshot_trigger);
>  static DEFINE_TRIGGER(switch_output_trigger);
> @@ -561,24 +563,24 @@ static int record__mmap_read_evlist(struct record *rec, 
> struct perf_evlist *evli
>                                   bool overwrite)
>  {
>       u64 bytes_written = rec->bytes_written;
> -     int i;
> +     int i, nr;
>       int rc = 0;
> -     struct perf_mmap *maps;
> +     struct perf_mmap **maps;
>  
>       if (!evlist)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     maps = overwrite ? evlist->overwrite_mmap : evlist->mmap;
> +     maps = overwrite ? thread->ovw_mmap : thread->mmap;
>       if (!maps)
>               return 0;
>  
>       if (overwrite && evlist->bkw_mmap_state != BKW_MMAP_DATA_PENDING)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     for (i = 0; i < evlist->nr_mmaps; i++) {
> -             struct perf_mmap *map = &maps[i];
> -             struct perf_mmap *track_map =  evlist->track_mmap ?
> -                                           &evlist->track_mmap[i] : NULL;
> +     nr = overwrite ? thread->ovw_mmap_nr : thread->mmap_nr;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> +             struct perf_mmap *map = maps[i];
>  
>               if (map->base) {
>                       if (perf_mmap__push(map, rec, record__pushfn) != 0) {
> @@ -592,21 +594,20 @@ static int record__mmap_read_evlist(struct record *rec, 
> struct perf_evlist *evli
>                       rc = -1;
>                       goto out;
>               }
> -
> -             if (track_map && track_map->base) {
> -                     if (perf_mmap__push(track_map, rec, record__pushfn) != 
> 0) {
> -                             rc = -1;
> -                             goto out;
> -                     }
> -             }
>       }
>  
>       /*
>        * Mark the round finished in case we wrote
>        * at least one event.
>        */
> -     if (bytes_written != rec->bytes_written)
> -             rc = record__write(rec, NULL, &finished_round_event, 
> sizeof(finished_round_event));
> +     if (bytes_written != rec->bytes_written) {
> +             /*
> +              * All maps of the threads point to a single file,
> +              * so we can just pick first one.
> +              */
> +             rc = record__write(rec, thread->mmap[0], &finished_round_event,

Shouldn't it be maps[0] ?

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +                                sizeof(finished_round_event));
> +     }
>  
>       if (overwrite)
>               perf_evlist__toggle_bkw_mmap(evlist, BKW_MMAP_EMPTY);
> @@ -1222,6 +1223,8 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, 
> const char **argv)
>                       goto out_child;
>       }
>  
> +     thread = &rec->threads[0];
> +
>       err = bpf__apply_obj_config();
>       if (err) {
>               char errbuf[BUFSIZ];
> @@ -1415,7 +1418,7 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, 
> const char **argv)
>               if (hits == rec->samples) {
>                       if (done || draining)
>                               break;
> -                     err = perf_evlist__poll(rec->evlist, -1);
> +                     err = fdarray__poll(&thread->pollfd, -1);
>                       /*
>                        * Propagate error, only if there's any. Ignore positive
>                        * number of returned events and interrupt error.
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Reply via email to