Hi,

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:16:02AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Now that static device properties understand notion of child nodes, let's
> teach gpiolib to tie such children and machine GPIO descriptor tables.
> We will continue using a single table for entire device, but instead of
> using connection ID as a lookup key in the GPIO descriptor table directly,
> we will perform additional translation: fwnode_get_named_gpiod() when
> dealing with property_set-backed fwnodes will try parsing string property
> with name matching connection ID and use result of the lookup as the key in
> the table:
> 
> static const struct property_entry dev_child1_props[] __initconst = {
>       ...
>       PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("gpios",          "child-1-gpios"),
>       { }
> };
> 
> static struct gpiod_lookup_table dev_gpiod_table = {
>       .dev_id = "some-device",
>       .table = {
>               ...
>               GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("B", 1, "child-1-gpios", 1, GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW),
>               ...
>       },
> };

I wonder if instead of passing and parsing strings (and hoping there are
no typos) we could get the compiler to help us bit more?

Something like below:

static const struct property_entry dev_child1_props[] __initconst = {
        ...
        PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("gpios","child-1-gpios"),
        { }
};
 
static struct gpiod_lookup_table dev_gpiod_table = {
        .dev_id = "some-device",
        .table = {
                ...
                GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("B", 1, dev_child1_props, 
SIZEOF(dev_child1_props),
                                1, GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW),
                ...
        },
};

Reply via email to