From: Vijay Viswanath <vvisw...@codeaurora.org>

The load a particular sdhc controller should request from a regulator
is device specific and hence each device should individually vote for
the required load.

Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vvisw...@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadi...@codeaurora.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt 
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
index 502b3b8..3720385 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ Required properties:
        "cal"   - reference clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional)
        "sleep" - sleep clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional)
 
+Optional properties:
+- qcom,<supply>-current-level-microamp - specifies load levels for supply 
during BUS_ON and
+                                       BUS_OFF states in power irq. Should be 
specified in
+                                       pairs (lpm, hpm), for BUS_OFF and 
BUS_ON respectively.
+                                       Units uA.
 Example:
 
        sdhc_1: sdhci@f9824900 {
@@ -37,6 +42,7 @@ Example:
 
                vmmc-supply = <&pm8941_l20>;
                vqmmc-supply = <&pm8941_s3>;
+               qcom,vqmmc-current-level-microamp = <200 22000>;
 
                pinctrl-names = "default";
                pinctrl-0 = <&sdc1_clk &sdc1_cmd &sdc1_data>;
-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., 
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to