On (09/21/18 09:37), Petr Mladek wrote: > > I would personally keep the size as unsigned int. IMHO, a support > for a log buffer bigger than 4GB is not worth the complexity. >
ftrace dumps are bothering me. Steven Rostedt wrote [0]: > > Especially when I have a machine with 240 CPUs. But it also has a ton of > RAM, I could easily do log_buf_len=32G > The systems are getting bigger, so log_buf_len=UINT_MAX+ might become a norm at some point. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ -ss
