Hi!

> > > > Your above argument that the Code of Conduct is problematic because of
> > > > who wrote it seems to contradict your statement that we shall judge by
> > > > code (or text) alone.
> > > I think there are important differences between code to be run by CPUs
> > >  and a Code to be run by humans.  And when the author goes on a victory
> > >  lap on Twitter and declares the Code to be "a political document", is
> > >  it any surprise I'm worried?
> > 
> > Would you have link on that?
> 
> The CoC is a political document:
> https://web.archive.org/web/20180924234027/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1041465346656530432
> 
> Possible victory lap 1:
> https://web.archive.org/web/20180921104730/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1041441155874009093
> 
> Possible victory lap 2:
> https://web.archive.org/web/20180920211406/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1042249983590838272
> 

Thanks!

I thought you was referring to this... http://archive.is/6nhps
... which is somehow even more disturbing to me.

                                                        Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to