Hi! > > > > Your above argument that the Code of Conduct is problematic because of > > > > who wrote it seems to contradict your statement that we shall judge by > > > > code (or text) alone. > > > I think there are important differences between code to be run by CPUs > > > and a Code to be run by humans. And when the author goes on a victory > > > lap on Twitter and declares the Code to be "a political document", is > > > it any surprise I'm worried? > > > > Would you have link on that? > > The CoC is a political document: > https://web.archive.org/web/20180924234027/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1041465346656530432 > > Possible victory lap 1: > https://web.archive.org/web/20180921104730/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1041441155874009093 > > Possible victory lap 2: > https://web.archive.org/web/20180920211406/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1042249983590838272 >
Thanks! I thought you was referring to this... http://archive.is/6nhps ... which is somehow even more disturbing to me. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
