On 26.9.2018 17:34, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/26/18 4:06 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Fix english spelling in of_alias_get_alias_list().
>>
>> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> Greg: Please apply it on the top of tty-next because patch is going via
>> your tree.
> 
> Maybe a few more fixes first...
> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/of/base.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>> index 33011b88ed3f..ffcbb2963ba2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>> @@ -1948,7 +1948,7 @@ int of_alias_get_id(struct device_node *np, const char 
>> *stem)
>>   * @matches:        Array of OF device match structures to search in
>>   * @stem:   Alias stem of the given device_node
>>   * @bitmap: Bitmap field pointer
>> - * @nbits:  Maximum number of alias ID which can be recorded it bitmap
>> + * @nbits:  Maximum number of alias IDs which can be recorded it bitmap
> 
> s/it/in/
> 
>>   *
>>   * The function travels the lookup table to record alias ids for the given
>>   * device match structures and alias stem.
>> @@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ int of_alias_get_alias_list(const struct of_device_id 
>> *matches,
>>                       __func__, app->stem, app->id);
>>  
>>              if (strcmp(app->stem, stem) != 0) {
>> -                    pr_debug("%s: stem comparison doesn't passed %s\n",
>> +                    pr_debug("%s: stem comparison didn't pass %s\n",
>>                               __func__, app->stem);
>>                      continue;
>>              }
>> @@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ int of_alias_get_alias_list(const struct of_device_id 
>> *matches,
>>                      pr_debug("%s: Allocated ID %d\n", __func__, app->id);
>>                      set_bit(app->id, bitmap);
>>              }
>> -            /* Alias exist but it not compatible with matches */
>> +            /* Alias exists but it not compatible with matches */
> 
> s/it/is/
> 
>>      }
>>      mutex_unlock(&of_mutex);
>>  
>>
> 
> thanks,

I will include these fixes to v2 and will wait for Geert in connection
to discussion we had in origin thread.

Thanks,
Michal


Reply via email to