Mihir Mehta <[email protected]> writes:
> The file namei.c seems to have been renamed to namei_msdos.c, so I
> decided to update the comment with the correct name, and expand it a bit
> to tell the reader what to look for.
> ---
> fs/fat/dir.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c
> index b833ffe..d954e18 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/fat/dir.c
> @@ -368,7 +368,8 @@ static int fat_parse_short(struct super_block *sb,
> }
>
> memcpy(work, de->name, sizeof(work));
> - /* see namei.c, msdos_format_name */
> + /* For an explanation of the special treatment of 0x05 in
> + filenames, see msdos_format_name in namei_msdos.c */
> if (work[0] == 0x05)
> work[0] = 0xE5;
Sorry. However, could you use
/*
*
*/
style comment? Otherwise, looks good.
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
