Hi Olof,

Thanks for the review. Pushed v4 with suggested fixes. Let us know if series 
looks good and we can create pull request for same.

Thanks,
Jolly Shah


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olof Johansson [mailto:o...@lixom.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 1:49 PM
> To: Jolly Shah <jol...@xilinx.com>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturque...@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd
> <sb...@codeaurora.org>; Michal Simek <mich...@xilinx.com>; ARM-SoC
> Maintainers <a...@kernel.org>; linux-clk <linux-...@vger.kernel.org>; Rajan
> Vaja <raj...@xilinx.com>; Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org>; Rajan Vaja <raj...@xilinx.com>; Jolly Shah
> <jol...@xilinx.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] firmware: xilinx: Add zynqmp IOCTL API for device
> control
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just nits on code readability below. Approach looks OK to me.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:13 AM Jolly Shah <jolly.s...@xilinx.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rajan Vaja <rajan.v...@xilinx.com>
> >
> > Add ZynqMP firmware IOCTL API to control and configure devices like
> > PLLs, SD, Gem, etc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajan Vaja <rajan.v...@xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jolly Shah <jol...@xilinx.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c     | 43
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h |  4 +++-
> >  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> > b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> > index 84b3fd2..671a37a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> > @@ -428,6 +428,48 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_clock_getparent(u32 clock_id,
> u32 *parent_id)
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * zynqmp_is_valid_ioctl() - Check whether IOCTL ID is valid or not
> > + * @ioctl_id:  IOCTL ID
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 if IOCTL is valid, else -EINVAL  */ static inline int
> > +zynqmp_is_valid_ioctl(u32 ioctl_id)
> 
> I think most who come across the use of this would expect an
> .*is_valid() to return true (non-0) when valid, and 0 otherwise.
> 
> > +{
> > +       if (ioctl_id == IOCTL_SET_PLL_FRAC_MODE ||
> > +           ioctl_id == IOCTL_GET_PLL_FRAC_MODE ||
> > +           ioctl_id == IOCTL_SET_PLL_FRAC_DATA ||
> > +           ioctl_id == IOCTL_GET_PLL_FRAC_DATA)
> > +               return 0;
> 
> This is purely a matter of taste, and no requirement to change, but I find a
> switch slightly easier to read for this kind of usage:
> 
>         switch(ioctl_id) {
>         case IOCTL_SET_PLL_FRAC_MODE:
>         case IOCTL_GET_PLL_FRAC_MODE:
>         case IOCTL_SET_PLL_FRAC_DATA:
>         case IOCTL_GET_PLL_FRAC_DATA:
>                 return 1;
>         default:
>                 return 0;
>         }
> 
> > +
> > +       return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * zynqmp_pm_ioctl() - PM IOCTL API for device control and configs
> > + * @node_id:   Node ID of the device
> > + * @ioctl_id:  ID of the requested IOCTL
> > + * @arg1:      Argument 1 to requested IOCTL call
> > + * @arg2:      Argument 2 to requested IOCTL call
> > + * @out:       Returned output value
> > + *
> > + * This function calls IOCTL to firmware for device control and 
> > configuration.
> > + *
> > + * Return: Returns status, either success or error+reason  */ static
> > +int zynqmp_pm_ioctl(u32 node_id, u32 ioctl_id, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
> > +                          u32 *out)
> > +{
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       ret = zynqmp_is_valid_ioctl(ioctl_id);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               return ret;
> 
> So with changed return values, this would turn into:
> 
>         if (!zynqmp_is_valid_ioctl(ioctl_id))
>                 return -EINVAL;
> 
> > +
> > +       return zynqmp_pm_invoke_fn(PM_IOCTL, node_id, ioctl_id,
> > +                                  arg1, arg2, out); }
> > +
> >  static const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops eemi_ops = {
> >         .get_api_version = zynqmp_pm_get_api_version,
> >         .query_data = zynqmp_pm_query_data, @@ -440,6 +482,7 @@ static
> > const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops eemi_ops = {
> >         .clock_getrate = zynqmp_pm_clock_getrate,
> >         .clock_setparent = zynqmp_pm_clock_setparent,
> >         .clock_getparent = zynqmp_pm_clock_getparent,
> > +       .ioctl = zynqmp_pm_ioctl,
> >  };
> >
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
> > b/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
> > index 015e130..7a9db08 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
> > @@ -34,7 +34,8 @@
> >
> >  enum pm_api_id {
> >         PM_GET_API_VERSION = 1,
> > -       PM_QUERY_DATA = 35,
> > +       PM_IOCTL = 34,
> > +       PM_QUERY_DATA,
> >         PM_CLOCK_ENABLE,
> >         PM_CLOCK_DISABLE,
> >         PM_CLOCK_GETSTATE,
> > @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ struct zynqmp_eemi_ops {
> >         int (*clock_getrate)(u32 clock_id, u64 *rate);
> >         int (*clock_setparent)(u32 clock_id, u32 parent_id);
> >         int (*clock_getparent)(u32 clock_id, u32 *parent_id);
> > +       int (*ioctl)(u32 node_id, u32 ioctl_id, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
> > + u32 *out);
> >  };
> >
> >  #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQMP)
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >

Reply via email to